Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Terror Cases Now at Pre-9/11 Rate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:13 PM
Original message
Study: Terror Cases Now at Pre-9/11 Rate


http://apnews.excite.com/article/20060903/D8JTLG3G0.html

Study: Terror Cases Now at Pre-9/11 Rate
Email this Story

Sep 3, 6:32 PM (ET)

By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

WASHINGTON (AP) - The federal government has fallen back to prosecuting international terrorists at about the same rate it did before Sept. 11, according to a study based on Justice Department data.

The surprising decline followed a sharp increase in such criminal prosecutions in the year after the attacks, according to a study released Sunday by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a data research group at Syracuse University.

The analysis of data from Justice's Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys also found:

In the eight months ending last May, Justice attorneys declined to prosecute more than nine out of every 10 terrorism cases sent to them by the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies. Nearly 4 in 10 of the rejected cases were scrapped because prosecutors found weak or insufficient evidence, no evidence of criminal intent or no evident federal crime.

FULL story at link above.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm am not surprised, or amused.
"Justice attorneys declined to prosecute more than nine out of every 10 terrorism cases sent to them by the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies. Nearly 4 in 10 of the rejected cases were scrapped because prosecutors found weak or insufficient evidence, no evidence of criminal intent or no evident federal crime."

:mad:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rec 1. Heckuva job, Bushie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hummm I think the real terrorist are in the Govt. See videos at YouTube
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. So most of those "headlines" about breaking up terrorist cels........
and capturing terrorists on the streets of our country are............bullshit? :wtf: They're carefully orchestrated dog and pony shows, government propaganda, designed to give the American people the illusion that we're winning the "war on terra'"?

Our Republican controlled government continues to lie to us at a pace that would make a Whirling Dervish dizzy? Our Corporate Media doesn't report these FACTS, they'd rather report lies and innuendo, carrying the Bush Administration's water for them?

I find this hard to believe. :eyes: Our President would never lie to us (he's the moral compass of our country, after all) and the "Liberal Media" would be all over this like white on rice if it were true. Right? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. "...illusion that we're winning the "war on terra'"? "
No, they're designed to give the American people the illusion that we are under constant, unrelenting attack by terrorists.

In truth, the only terror being spread is by the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of couse... half the evidence is illegal!!!!!!
Damn that pesky 4th Amendment! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. You have saved my butt!
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 09:26 AM by snappyturtle
I have been blogging with two American idiots on the London of Times blog site of Mick Smith (Downing Street Memo fame). I humored them a couple days ago by following their instructions to Google "Mohammadens arrested in the U.S." (I had to substitute terrorists for Mohammedens) because they're such an enormous threat to our safety! I did the search and found insignificant material....NOTHING of any substance! Which was my point in the blog. A few minutes ago I sent a response with a couple of paragraphs of your sited article!!! Thank you.
:yourock: :applause:

Edit: K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. "As safe as we were under Clinton." Clap. Clap. Clap.
Please accept this gold-painted plastic replica of a legacy, and go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somnambulist Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Will we hear about this from the rightwingers?
The scuttlebut from the rightwingers like Rush You-know-who is that President Clinton did it all wrong by prosecuting them through the law, instead of chopping off their heads or something. Not hearing much from them about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hi Somnambulist!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Which probably means lower rates of prosecution than under Clinton.
Since some of Bush's first acts once in power were to drop as many of Clinton's anti-terrorism initiatives as he could drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC