You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: the risk of recriticality is not zero [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. the risk of recriticality is not zero
So maybe the word "can't" is a poor choice.



If the worst were to happen at the fuel pond at reactor 4, wouldn't the radiation then be so high as to prevent workers from continuing to make repairs to other nearby reactors?


And might this not cause further problems with water in other fuel ponds evaporating until they also have the possibility of reaching recriticality?




I will agree that the odds are against any of this happening, much less all of it, but if the risk is not zero then the word "can't" isn't applicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC