You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #158: It's not really mine -- it's the Supreme Court's New Deal precedents. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #150
158. It's not really mine -- it's the Supreme Court's New Deal precedents.
Edited on Wed Feb-02-11 03:58 AM by BzaDem
They can of course overrule them. I wouldn't want to be in a world where they did though, since most of the New Deal and post-New-Deal regulations of the economy rely specifically and solely on a broad, deferential interpretation of the necessary and proper clause that lets Congress figure out the means. I would be careful making the same arguments the libertarians do -- there might be some implications to them that you aren't considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC