You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #14: Right wingers would love that! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Right wingers would love that!
Not a one of those would they object to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -When they say, "traditional Biblical marriage," show them this. Hepburn  Dec-04-11 08:07 AM   #0 
  - It occurs to me  ewagner   Dec-04-11 08:13 AM   #1 
  - Until 1975, in California, a married woman could not own real propert in her own name alone.  Hepburn   Dec-04-11 08:15 AM   #2 
  - Marital rape was not illegal in all 50 states until 1993. That one surprised me. nt  Liquorice   Dec-05-11 02:03 AM   #48 
  - It's always about property - ownership (control). nt  TBF   Dec-04-11 08:59 AM   #7 
  - the ten commandments do not address this beyond do not  roguevalley   Dec-04-11 11:26 AM   #12 
     - The Ten Commandments do not say love your neighbor.  ZombieHorde   Dec-04-11 02:52 PM   #16 
     - They also punish thought crimes, purely symbolic religious crimes, ...  Deep13   Dec-04-11 09:39 PM   #37 
     - They also punish thought crimes, purely symbolic religious crimes, ...  Deep13   Dec-04-11 09:40 PM   #38 
     - I'm afraid that the ten commandments are only good if you're an Israelite....  Moonwalk   Dec-05-11 01:53 AM   #47 
  - Looses a bit of its punch  NV Whino   Dec-04-11 08:42 AM   #3 
  - It's not a typo - polygyny is the correct term for marriage with multiple wives.  scarletwoman   Dec-04-11 08:54 AM   #4 
  - I'm sorry but this is how the Left effing shoots itself in the foot. Using a term that  snagglepuss   Dec-04-11 06:35 PM   #22 
  - So we should embrace the dumbing down of America and help it along  Remember Me   Dec-04-11 09:08 PM   #36 
  - Blend in with the herd...  freshwest   Dec-04-11 09:46 PM   #39 
  - How is it "dumbing down" to use a less-specific, but equally correct and...  ClassWarrior   Dec-04-11 10:10 PM   #43 
     - It's more specific, hence it's use.  Lorien   Dec-05-11 04:47 AM   #51 
        - I didn't ask why it was used. I asked what makes it "dumbing down."  ClassWarrior   Dec-05-11 07:26 AM   #55 
  - Idiocracy!!!!!!!!!  Marrah_G   Dec-05-11 12:26 AM   #46 
  - give a hoot, read a book  datasuspect   Dec-05-11 11:27 AM   #59 
  - Guess I'm going to have to tutor my dictionary  NV Whino   Dec-05-11 08:05 AM   #56 
  - You mean "loses"?  ArcticFox   Dec-04-11 08:57 AM   #6 
  - I noticed that too  Morning Dew   Dec-04-11 11:44 AM   #15 
  - No offense, but  whathehell   Dec-04-11 09:50 PM   #41 
     - You can thank the phonics method for that.  Occulus   Dec-04-11 10:05 PM   #42 
  - I'm sure most of them would be in favor  ArcticFox   Dec-04-11 08:56 AM   #5 
  - Betty Bowers  tomtharp   Dec-04-11 09:11 AM   #8 
  - I love Betty Bowers!  Hepburn   Dec-04-11 09:17 AM   #9 
  - Agreed and welcome!  JNelson6563   Dec-04-11 10:12 PM   #45 
  - i can just hear some fundamentalists  barbtries   Dec-04-11 11:07 AM   #10 
  - I honestly think that only a few conservatives would have a problem with any of these  saras   Dec-04-11 11:11 AM   #11 
  - effective graphic. -eom  Huey P. Long   Dec-04-11 11:29 AM   #13 
  - Right wingers would love that!  treestar   Dec-04-11 11:30 AM   #14 
  - And then there's the Constitution and what it says about marriage....  rgbecker   Dec-04-11 03:13 PM   #17 
  - Good ole Jewish law in the OT  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 03:22 PM   #18 
  - Come on. You know why: The OT is more fun  jmowreader   Dec-04-11 09:48 PM   #40 
  - Excellent!  Sherman A1   Dec-04-11 06:18 PM   #19 
  - REC. but my wife isn't going to go along with the concubines part. nt  bertman   Dec-04-11 06:28 PM   #20 
  - And, Vatican used to marry homosexuals a thousand or so years back -- !!  defendandprotect   Dec-04-11 06:31 PM   #21 
  - Do you have any links/more info on that?  a2liberal   Dec-05-11 03:31 AM   #49 
  - Concubines? We can have concubines? Honey, there's something here you need to read!  tclambert   Dec-04-11 06:46 PM   #23 
  - Betty Bowers Explains Traditional Marriage to Everyone Else  Gabi Hayes   Dec-04-11 06:51 PM   #24 
  - Excellent! n/t  krispos42   Dec-04-11 07:23 PM   #25 
  - Excellent! K&R n/t  krispos42   Dec-04-11 07:24 PM   #26 
  - Test n/t  krispos42   Dec-04-11 07:25 PM   #27 
  - Delete  AtheistCrusader   Dec-04-11 07:47 PM   #28 
  - Of course these foul bastards excuse the rape one as  AtheistCrusader   Dec-04-11 07:48 PM   #29 
  - Being forced to marry your rapist is still happening now.  Occupy_2012   Dec-04-11 08:21 PM   #33 
     - I think the word you're searching for is "Muslim." Or is it just not cricket to criticize Islam?  WinkyDink   Dec-05-11 05:28 AM   #54 
        - Not really, oddly.  Occupy_2012   Dec-05-11 11:19 AM   #57 
  - lol.....its BDSM...biblical fetishes lol  CarrieLynne   Dec-04-11 07:56 PM   #30 
  - Argh, I hate typos in otherwise well-done work.  Beartracks   Dec-04-11 08:08 PM   #31 
  - The original author was correct  Alameda   Dec-04-11 08:58 PM   #34 
     - It's still a typo/misspelling either way (n/t)  a2liberal   Dec-05-11 03:32 AM   #50 
  - THANKS! Got It Bookmarked AND Screen Captured!  66 dmhlt   Dec-04-11 08:09 PM   #32 
  - Also show them, "Betty Bowers Explains Traditional Marriage to Everyone Else"  Ian David   Dec-04-11 08:58 PM   #35 
  - That's pretty funny  Renew Deal   Dec-04-11 10:12 PM   #44 
  - It has taken wars  sulphurdunn   Dec-05-11 05:22 AM   #52 
  - I Googled. "Biblical" seems to be an added term. The usual one is "Traditional Christian."  WinkyDink   Dec-05-11 05:27 AM   #53 
  - and still we are 'bitches' when we complain  lunatica   Dec-05-11 11:25 AM   #58 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC