Reply #93: You're cute.

[The Doctor.]

Here's what we don't know;

-Whether the neighbor you've decided to place your faith in was objective, had decent eyesight, actually saw the event, and didn't already hate the dog for barking all hours of the night and had just a wide enough vindictive streak to spite their neighbor.

You don't know.

Here's what we do know;

- The cop was armed with more than a gun, was wearing footwear, and outweighed the dog significantly.
- The dog was not armed with anything more than teeth, which, unless you're really ignorant, are still not as lethal as bullets fired from a gun.
- The cop shot the dog.

Which brings us right back to the same point I keep making that you want to avoid;

"Your point is just ridiculous. It doesn't matter what the cop had for an 'arsenal'. He had a foot, and it was likely in a boot or a shoe. If your point is that cops aren't physically capable of defending themselves against a little terrier without a gun, then you've also made the point that they shouldn't be cops at all."

By this time, as you've decided to defend the armed and powerful killing the barely lethal (Yes, still waiting for you to provide the "Police Deaths by Jack Russel Terrier" stats you can't seem to find) under circumstances you only think you know, it is apparent that you are not someone who is reasonable. Don't respond. I won't be kind to you anymore.