You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: nope, the damages are a result of ingestion and addiction. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
64. nope, the damages are a result of ingestion and addiction.
My argument is against the unrestricted access of the cartels who will of course encourage the ingestion of something they know will continue to fill their coffers by the addicted.

Do you think the addicted person will have unlimited funds to satisfy the addiction? What happens when they run out of money? Companies, cartels, corporations legally supplying the heroine have one goal in mind...money. They don't care how the purchaser gets it or how much they supply. The more the merrier. Legalizing drugs, doesn't solve the ultimate illegalities that will occur to satisfy the addiciton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC