Reply #13: Look, I firmly support OWS....

[vi5]

But I'm still not clear on why occupying DC wouldn't be the better approach or why it would be logistically more difficult.

The fact is that nothing is going to change the minds of the people on Wall Street. No amount of people, no amount of camping, no amount of nothing.

So what is the end game? I agree with the goals. More fairness in the laws....more regulation...stop rigging the game for the wealthy.

But nobody on Wall Street is going to allow that to happen let alone do anything about it themselves.

Please don't flame me. As I said, I fully support OWS, I just think it may need to regroup and refocus as you said and I still am curious for a more clear explanation why this same movement in DC wouldn't be the better approach.

Thanks in advance.