You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #80: Sigh. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Sigh.
The only thing the article says about marks on the child was that the grandmother saw them and took her to the hospital. That's it. There is no info as to whether they were still there when she got to the hospital, no info as to whether they were serious enough to cause bruising or whether they were slight and recent, nothing more than to state what the grandmother saw.

That's what I mean by scant facts. Anyone jumping to a conclusion other than what the article stated - which was that the grandmother saw red marks - is fabricating a story around stuff they are making up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC