Reply #95: What? The crime itself is described in the court paperwork. I was giving you examples of people...

[joshcryer]

...discrediting the victim as you are trying to do here with your long pointless Bush junta screeds. It's simple, you're showing gross hypocrisy by prejudging the Bush junta without a trial and by ignoring the evidence we know of in the DSK rape case (yes, he raped her, oral penetration is rape, it's just that NY law considers that sodomy and it is classified under a lesser charge of criminal sexual assault). And by expecting others to not prejudge DSK. People have a right to form opinions, and so far there exist no legitimate opinion that actually provides any evidence whatsoever as to DSKs innocence. Kinda like how there's no evidence to prove Bush's innocence. But Bush committed a crime according to you, but DSK did not. It's gross.

BTW, it's clear where you're going with this. But you know I would never support NATO troops occupying another Arab country, either.

But I likewise am not quick to malign Arabs as terrorists, either. Nor am I blind to align myself with authoritarian leftists just because they claim to be anti-imperialists.