Reply #327: In case you have not figured it out yet.

[bluestate10]

I really don't give a rat's ass about totally convincing the unconvincible. Nader's arrogance saddled the nation with four years of Bush, minimum, was highly likely the reason why 9/11 happened, as well as the moronic strategy that was advanced for "winning" the Afghan war that ensued after 9/11. Bush came in and ignored intelligence that pointed to 9/11 being planned. You can claim that 9/11 would have happened because the terrorists that conducted it were embedded in the USA, but I can claim with as much validity that if intelligence had been followed and acted on, those terrorists would have been rounded up and 9/11 prevented. So who is right? Of course you are going to say you're right and post all types of asinine, way left links to prove your point, according to you. But the fact is, you have no idea what the f*** would have happened. Neither do I, so let's just stay in our corners. My opinion of Nader is that he is an irrelevant has been who is of no significance and has not been for more than three decades.