You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #138: You miss one essential characteristic. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
138. You miss one essential characteristic.
Edited on Tue Mar-29-11 09:03 AM by TahitiNut
An "entitlement" exists SOLELY by government fiat.

Break down the word itself and focus on "title" -- something that does not exist in nature. Think of "titles" like "Duke" or "Baron" or "lord" ... and think back to the days of monarchies where "title" conferred economic power. In those days, ALL the land of the "realm" was presumptively owned (granted by GOD to the control) by the monarch ... the sovereign. The 'subjects' were, for the most part, mere chattel. ALL the proceeds of anyone's labors on the land (the sole "means of production") were owned by the monarch ... to be doled out as the monarch saw fit (or by whim).

Think about Pennsylvania ... an entitlement to William Penn.

Now... think about the title to a car, the title (fee simple) to land and real property. Those titles exist (and have value) SOLELY by government fiat ... and a system of (government) record-keeping, (government) police power, and (government) courts required to obey that fiat. And it's ALL paid for by working people ... to the benefit of their Masters.

The right wing is the very WORST at abusing "entitlements" ... think about the stock market. Think about their attitude towards capital. They regard a CAPITALIST as virtually the same as a monarch ... presumedly the 'entitled' owner of ALL THE PROCEEDS from any labor performed using their "means of production."

It's insidious.

:puke:

(I've packed a LOT into the above summary ... and mere phrases used above could easily be expanded to essays.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC