Reply #11: Sure it does.

[FBaggins]

It's a "he said she said" between two un-sourced quotes. They don't even directly contradict each other, but the one I gave clearly supports the title of the article. So not everyone agrees? Big deal. But the author is clearly in the better position to weigh the statements and come up with a title.

Moreover... "rogue" doesn't have to have a negative connotation. It could just mean that these groups are going it on their own rather than under the direction of the DNC or WH.

The quote you cite implies that the President still holds the 2008-2010 position, which is clearly contradicted by the above statements from the same article.

No it isn't. The WH could easily "recognize" that more money will be needed this time around... that doesn't imply that they agree with the money going to outside groups rather than party-controlled funds.