You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Well said [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
DFab420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well said
and much nicer then I feel I could have been.

It's gotten to the point that no matter what success we have, we must somehow find a reason that it is actually a failure.

It's old.

It needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -There is a BIG difference between "criticism" and "bashing". johnaries  Nov-15-10 09:50 PM   #0 
  - Very true and very well said!  JamesA1102   Nov-15-10 09:54 PM   #1 
  - Thanks! I will present facts and truth...  johnaries   Nov-15-10 10:53 PM   #8 
  - I hear ya  solara   Nov-15-10 09:56 PM   #2 
  - Why unilaterally appoint Simpson and Bowles to run a 'Deficit Commission'?  MannyGoldstein   Nov-15-10 09:56 PM   #3 
  - And here we go..... Automatic bashing.  johnaries   Nov-15-10 10:37 PM   #6 
     - ''bipartisan'' as a virtue depends on the false idea that their are no meaningful differences  yurbud   Nov-15-10 11:22 PM   #11 
     - The Fiscal Commission was a very, very, very bad idea  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-16-10 09:48 AM   #18 
     - Wow, you are defending a commission whose purpose is to tear down what is left of the New Deal?  MadHound   Nov-16-10 06:49 PM   #35 
  - Few people know the difference, and it's scarcely surprising.  Dr Morbius   Nov-15-10 10:04 PM   #4 
  - Good grief. I cant speak for the GLBT community but to suggest that we postpone a temporary solution  rhett o rick   Nov-15-10 10:35 PM   #5 
  - A comet is going to hit the earth in 2012? that's your argument?  johnaries   Nov-15-10 10:49 PM   #7 
  - Of course I would love to get the issue "resolved correctly and permanently". But we are playing  rhett o rick   Nov-16-10 08:11 AM   #12 
  - The OP also indulges in the fantasy that DADT is the whole  Bluenorthwest   Nov-16-10 08:44 AM   #13 
  - Actually that comet has been proven to be false. Link to article.  vaberella   Nov-16-10 04:02 PM   #30 
     - I was using it as a metaphor for the Repukes winning the election. nm  rhett o rick   Nov-17-10 12:15 AM   #36 
  - Think "Skinner's" NEW New Rules settled this today .....  defendandprotect   Nov-15-10 10:59 PM   #9 
  - Hmm, that's not what Skinner said. He did defend Obama supporters against insults, though.  ClarkUSA   Nov-16-10 09:50 AM   #19 
     - Evidently you did some selective reading ... here's also what it said ....  defendandprotect   Nov-16-10 12:17 PM   #20 
        - Any criticism has to focus on actions ONLY w/no disrespectful insults against Obama himself.  ClarkUSA   Nov-16-10 12:31 PM   #22 
           - Suggesting that criticism is "bashing" is intended to "poison the atmosphere" ....  defendandprotect   Nov-16-10 12:51 PM   #26 
              - That's not what the OP is doing at all. Evidently, you're misreading its content.  ClarkUSA   Nov-16-10 12:56 PM   #27 
              - Certainly looks like the OP is trying to highlight criticism of Obama as "bashing" .....  defendandprotect   Nov-16-10 04:19 PM   #32 
              - Unfortunately it is far too clear that it is plain old criticism you are labeling "bashing" ....  defendandprotect   Nov-17-10 12:13 PM   #37 
              - You didn't read the post---s/he is equating misinformation used to criticize as bashing.  vaberella   Nov-16-10 04:07 PM   #31 
                 - If there is "misinformation" then THAT has to be the basis of the objection ... not "bashing."  defendandprotect   Nov-16-10 04:35 PM   #33 
  - I'm trying to figure out how you presume to know the criticism comes from ...  laughingliberal   Nov-15-10 11:02 PM   #10 
  - Without much presumption  Bluenorthwest   Nov-16-10 08:46 AM   #15 
  - Kick for truthiness and civility.  great white snark   Nov-16-10 08:45 AM   #14 
  - Only a tiny handful of people have been President, we don't get to walk a mile in their shoes  TheKentuckian   Nov-16-10 09:40 AM   #16 
  - Last week I saw a fine example of the twisting of these terms.  JNelson6563   Nov-16-10 09:46 AM   #17 
  - BRAVO!!!  Phx_Dem   Nov-16-10 12:29 PM   #21 
  - +1000000.  political_Dem   Nov-16-10 12:49 PM   #25 
  - Well said  DFab420   Nov-16-10 12:34 PM   #23 
  - Although I criticize Obama a lot...  KeyserSoze87   Nov-16-10 12:39 PM   #24 
  - Very well said. Also, when those who ONLY offer critique of the President, hide under the  mzmolly   Nov-16-10 01:29 PM   #28 
  - Excellent post. I think you clearly expressed much of what some of us have tried to say. n/t  vaberella   Nov-16-10 04:00 PM   #29 
  - Amen!  angee_is_mad   Nov-16-10 06:43 PM   #34 
  - if you ALWAYS criticize, you are bashing  krawhitham   Nov-17-10 12:40 PM   #38 
  - Criticism is what one says of someone else's hero; bashing is what someone does to yours.  PurityOfEssence   Nov-18-10 12:19 AM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC