NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-24-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 33. Please read my original OP, I have already explained the entire situation |
| -Is Elizabeth Warren qualified to create an agency from scratch? |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 09:02 AM |
#0 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 09:15 AM |
#1 |
 -
No, that poster is not a liberal. |
VMI Dem |
Jul-24-10 09:18 AM |
#3 |
| -
Are you? |
jefferson_dem |
Jul-24-10 09:23 AM |
#5 |
| -
A Democrat does not a liberal make, and thus far .......... |
Exilednight |
Jul-24-10 12:06 PM |
#64 |
 -
In the real world, then,. |
Zavulon |
Jul-24-10 04:38 PM |
#85 |
| -
What is a liberal to you? |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 10:12 AM |
#11 |
| -
Seems your question is considered |
POAS |
Jul-24-10 12:27 PM |
#69 |
| -
I will repeat my point, you should stop pretending to be the keeper of party purity |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:34 AM |
#19 |
| -
don't you mean "pragmatic"? |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 10:40 AM |
#25 |
| -
No I think the rift is better described by realists (people who are often older |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:42 AM |
#26 |
| -
I'm 54...is that old enough to disagree with you? |
pmorlan1 |
Jul-24-10 01:57 PM |
#79 |
| -
Oh, but you're *never* old/experienced/smart enough to win against an... |
Ignis |
Jul-24-10 07:26 PM |
#96 |
| -
+1 nt |
laughingliberal |
Jul-26-10 02:38 AM |
#104 |
| -
In other words, the rift is between those who |
dflprincess |
Jul-24-10 09:29 PM |
#98 |
| -
EXCELLENT POINT!! |
SkyDaddy7 |
Jul-26-10 05:19 AM |
#110 |
| -
Have you ever met a real conservative? |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:48 AM |
#57 |
| -
OMG LOL Is this the new thing around here? |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 09:30 AM |
#6 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 10:15 AM |
#12 |
| -
you might have a point, if I didnt address it. |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 10:16 AM |
#13 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 11:49 AM |
#58 |
| -
True scotsman. |
boppers |
Jul-24-10 04:22 PM |
#84 |
| -
Yep, he's a liberal. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 10:10 AM |
#10 |
| -
LOL |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 10:24 AM |
#14 |
| -
Seems to me that the unknowing have a real problem with themselves. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 10:31 AM |
#16 |
| -
+ 100000000 |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 10:33 AM |
#17 |
| -
twisted by who? |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 10:39 AM |
#24 |
| -
Don't you dare compare me to the right wing. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 10:51 AM |
#29 |
| -
"liberal" has a meaning |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:08 AM |
#35 |
| -
Look at that, another one item agenda. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 11:16 AM |
#41 |
| -
and now you trot out another talking point |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:19 AM |
#44 |
| -
Not a talking point at all. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 11:29 AM |
#48 |
| -
It means one who is fine with capitalism but believes in government |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:51 AM |
#59 |
| -
I think your hyperbole has just stepped out of bounds |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:11 AM |
#37 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 11:13 AM |
#40 |
| -
The BOG??? |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:22 AM |
#46 |
| -
go ahead and say it! |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:44 AM |
#52 |
| -
You are? OMG that is not what I was going to say |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:47 AM |
#55 |
| -
it's a guilty conscience thing. |
dionysus |
Jul-24-10 12:26 PM |
#68 |
| -
and here comes the usual crew! |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 12:43 PM |
#73 |
| -
No. n/t |
QC |
Jul-24-10 05:37 PM |
#90 |
| -
Since you stated that, I can't help but have a question |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:54 AM |
#62 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 12:49 PM |
#74 |
| -
ok got you, |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 12:52 PM |
#75 |
| -
you're welcome |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 05:13 PM |
#87 |
| -
tell that pack of losers I said "hi", esp Freddie! |
dionysus |
Jul-24-10 12:26 PM |
#67 |
| -
I have seen people twist the compassion of liberalism and turn it into a desire |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:51 AM |
#28 |
| -
That's true. |
jaxx |
Jul-24-10 10:52 AM |
#30 |
| -
We liberals are compassionate and draw the line at people |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:53 AM |
#31 |
| -
see post #24 |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:11 AM |
#38 |
| -
I think you need to take a more realistic position |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:35 AM |
#20 |
| -
you mean the reality that Wall Street doesn't want Elizibeth |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 10:44 AM |
#27 |
| -
1st part is reality, 2nd part hyperbole |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 10:56 AM |
#32 |
| -
Geithner, Summers, Bernanke |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:09 AM |
#36 |
| -
... |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:17 AM |
#42 |
| -
no, really - make an argument |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 11:20 AM |
#45 |
| -
You leave no room, it's hard to make a argument with conjecture. |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:24 AM |
#47 |
| -
It's all about people, not about qualifications |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:53 AM |
#60 |
| -
so you know what I'm thinking? |
paulk |
Jul-24-10 12:52 PM |
#76 |
| -
Please read my original OP, I have already explained the entire situation |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 11:01 AM |
#33 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 11:17 AM |
#43 |
| -
I think for myself. I consider the facts, weigh it against my life experience and training |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 11:31 AM |
#50 |
| -
Factor these in when reaching you conclusion: |
66 dmhlt |
Jul-24-10 11:47 AM |
#54 |
| -
neo-liberal? (nt) |
w4rma |
Jul-24-10 12:31 PM |
#72 |
| -
Well you can pretend to be the keeper of party purity, but that doesn't make it so |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:34 AM |
#18 |
| -
Hilarious, everything is a defining moment and a last straw |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:47 AM |
#56 |
| -
no, i don't think it's the MSM, or even the greenwald types. once you have predetermined |
dionysus |
Jul-24-10 12:28 PM |
#71 |
| -
It isn't evident in his posts, so he has to announce it frequently |
spoony |
Jul-24-10 03:19 PM |
#82 |
| -
it depends |
Enrique |
Jul-24-10 09:16 AM |
#2 |
| -
Right, whatever he decides to do by definition is the right thing. |
hulka38 |
Jul-24-10 09:40 AM |
#8 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 10:27 AM |
#15 |
| -
Now those comments completely contradict the point I made |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:36 AM |
#21 |
| -
Wasn't that the argument used against Obama for president? |
MannyGoldstein |
Jul-24-10 09:22 AM |
#4 |
| -
I don't know, based upon his record of accomplishments despite the congress |
Windy |
Jul-24-10 09:42 AM |
#9 |
| -
Yes, but in the President's case he has far more experience |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:37 AM |
#22 |
| -
President is a different thing |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:55 AM |
#63 |
| -
It was, I think. Something about a phone ringing at 3AM. I found it disgusting. |
laughingliberal |
Jul-26-10 02:46 AM |
#105 |
| -
NJMaverick, I think |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 09:35 AM |
#7 |
| -
Thank you |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 10:38 AM |
#23 |
| -
You are welcome :) |
SunsetDreams |
Jul-24-10 11:04 AM |
#34 |
| -
Maybe, maybe not. But here's the thing |
DrToast |
Jul-24-10 11:12 AM |
#39 |
| -
The inventor of the idea is not always the best choice to implement it |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 11:33 AM |
#51 |
| -
Did you miss the part where I said, "Maybe, maybe not"? |
DrToast |
Jul-24-10 11:44 AM |
#53 |
| -
The DLC wants an industry insider in charge |
IndianaGreen |
Jul-24-10 11:30 AM |
#49 |
| -
Wouldn't the whole thing collapse if they just picked a man off the street to handle it? |
treestar |
Jul-24-10 11:54 AM |
#61 |
| -
Like all those oil experts we had at Mineral Management Service, and Salazar at Interior Dept. |
IndianaGreen |
Jul-24-10 12:09 PM |
#65 |
| -
There are always screw ups in the world, at every level |
treestar |
Jul-25-10 11:21 AM |
#99 |
| -
Warren is hardly a 'man off the street.' She knows the terrain. |
laughingliberal |
Jul-26-10 02:49 AM |
#106 |
| -
Getting "Out-In-Front" with the damage control... |
bvar22 |
Jul-24-10 12:16 PM |
#66 |
| -
Your post sounds like wishful thinking rather than a realistic assessment |
NJmaverick |
Jul-24-10 01:34 PM |
#78 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-24-10 06:00 PM |
#92 |
| -
It would appear so |
ibegurpard |
Jul-24-10 07:01 PM |
#95 |
| -
Yep. nt |
laughingliberal |
Jul-26-10 02:50 AM |
#107 |
| -
She just created one from scratch. Fully designed it, too. Involved in the entire process. (nt) |
w4rma |
Jul-24-10 12:27 PM |
#70 |
| -
Interesting question.... |
Spazito |
Jul-24-10 01:25 PM |
#77 |
| -
Of course..there's so many elements to |
Cha |
Jul-24-10 02:05 PM |
#80 |
| -
Well, Krugman and Barney Frank want her to be appointed |
Imperfect |
Jul-24-10 02:12 PM |
#81 |
| -
i don't see why not. but what do i know... |
dionysus |
Jul-24-10 03:29 PM |
#83 |
| -
I agree. I think she has the right vision and she should help set |
johnaries |
Jul-24-10 04:45 PM |
#86 |
| -
There are a whole lot of Wall Street types that WERE trained for management |
Skidmore |
Jul-24-10 05:18 PM |
#88 |
| -
Rick Warren AOK, Elizabeth Warren to brilliant. Whatever...... |
boston bean |
Jul-24-10 05:26 PM |
#89 |
| -
Now you have officially moved to the Right of many Right Wingers that I know |
Lorien |
Jul-24-10 05:51 PM |
#91 |
| -
While I understand your argument, there is nothing preventing her from hiring an operating officer |
BzaDem |
Jul-24-10 06:15 PM |
#93 |
| -
BINGO |
pmorlan1 |
Jul-24-10 06:45 PM |
#94 |
| -
brilliantly put |
dionysus |
Jul-24-10 09:24 PM |
#97 |
| -
+10,000 nt |
laughingliberal |
Jul-26-10 02:52 AM |
#108 |
| -
Yes, Elizabeth Warren is qualified. |
sabrina 1 |
Jul-25-10 03:21 PM |
#100 |
| -
More qualified than anyone in the administration now |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-25-10 07:09 PM |
#101 |
| -
if I apply your standard, then how can I listen to an EMT |
CreekDog |
Jul-26-10 01:36 AM |
#102 |
| -
A rare disagreement with my good friend. |
grantcart |
Jul-26-10 02:09 AM |
#103 |
| -
Well it was her idea, considering what Obama said. |
vaberella |
Jul-26-10 04:44 AM |
#109 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread