You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: The polls showed 70% wanted the Public Option!!! What part of that do you not understand? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. The polls showed 70% wanted the Public Option!!! What part of that do you not understand?
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 02:59 PM by CTyankee
Seventy percent is huge. I didn't see polling on the Medicare buy in but I can tell you that for years I have heard from people in their 50s that they wish they could have Medicare. And a recent survey done by a couple of researchers who travelled around the country interviewing people about what they wanted in health care reform had a lot of people asking "What happened to Single Payer?"

I know there were some good things in the Senate bill, no doubt about it. But the glaring, 800 lb. gorilla in the room is that not one of the three aforementioned ideas, supported widely in the public, were shot down before even getting a hearing (single payer advocates thrown out of the Capitol building).

Individual mandates, without the public option, is a huge loser among the populace. With the PO it is at least tolerable. And I agree that we must have the individual mandate (if we are not going to have Single Payer which would involve a tax, like Medicare). People like Medicare, even tho it involves being taxed, plus it made sense to build on an existing structure rather than imposing a rather creaky, new structure.

We could even avoid the "government run" plan if we went with something like the Swiss have, which are private companies. They are, however, nonprofits and are strictly regulated by the government. And there is a strong safety net for those who cannot affort the private plans. Ditto Netherlands in many ways (the Dutch invented capitalism, fer god's sake!).

It could all have been so different...I am saddened that our party chose this direction...we could add another chapter to "The March of Folly"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC