You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Yes, but the stance precludes large additions to it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, but the stance precludes large additions to it
This deficit concern won't do much, if anything, to reduce the deficit.

But what it does do is preclude consideration of steps that would add a lot to the deficit, even if they are the right thing to do today in order to have a healthier tax base tomorrow.

Anything that would actually reduce the deficit in the next few years would be economic suicide, even including raising taxes on the rich. (If taxes were raised on the rich to divert the money to the less-rich that would be fine. But raising taxes to pay down deficit/debt would be crippling.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC