Reply #13: The Plum line seems to take issue with the mailer

[Irish_shark]

"As Coakley’s own Web site says, after Brown’s amendment was rejected, he voted in favor of the bill to require emergency rooms to provide rape victims with emergency contraceptives, and the whole debate seems to be more nuanced than the mailer suggests."

From the link in the OP.

Plus doesn't the vote simply mean that hospital should find people without religious complaints to assist the victims? Did Brown really want to "turn them all away"?

He goes on to say, "The mailer could be related to the fact that internal Dem polling reportedly shows Coakley under-performing with less-affluent women."