Reply #24: No other ethical exceptions are judged on moral grounds

[dsc]

We have a right to practice religion in this country not practice religion that is moral or pleasing. But I don't see any principled difference here. You agree with the doctors but don't agree with the store owners. That isn't principle that is expediency. As for your other comment, I have asked, repeated, iterated, and reiterated for one example where a person was denied bc by a pharmacy, didn't have the script taken (which I do think should be forbidden) and couldn't get bc. Not a single, solitary example has yet been provided. Sorry, but this comes across as a non existant problem. BTW I have repaeatly said, as in atleast a couple dozen times, that I don't favor anyone but store owning pharmacists refusing bc. I don't think the government should carve out an ethical exception for people who don't want to do what their boss tells them to.