Reply #107: Thats irrelevant to my "analysis"

[quakerboy]

You asked about when Gibbs could laugh it off. I answered your question. Whether our President can or cannot have an effect on legislation is irrelevant to that question.

Ya'll defending Gibbs are the ones that gave me the numbers I used(talking point 1, its only 12% of the liberals who are not happy). Wheres the "sob story" you so angrily invoke? Obviously there are some people who want something that they are not getting. And they are becoming annoyed. Whether they are directing that irritation as you would, is again irrelevant to the reality of what is. They are what they are. What reason is there to go and actively antagonize them for no gain? And what reason is there to protect a supposed flunky(talking point 2, why not direct the anger at the policy makers not a mere spokesman) who does such a thing?