Reply #21: Disagree w/ the ADL? You're in good company!

[66 dmhlt]

J Street Statement on Cordoba House Controversy

The principle at stake in the Cordoba House controversy goes to the heart of American democracy and the value we place on freedom of religion. Should one religious group in this country be treated differently than another? We believe the answer is no.

http://www.jstreet.org/blog/?p=1177

ADL Enables Anti-Muslim Bigotry

Let's be clear. This is not about the proposed Islamic Center. There is already a masjid in the neighborhood, and it's been there for decades. This is about giving political cover to right-wing politicians using anti-Muslim bigotry as a political weapon and a fundraising tool. By doing this the ADL is increasingly eroding its already weakened credibility as a non-partisan organization.

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&year=2010&base_name=adl_condemns_enables_antimusli

A correction request

You cannot "categorically reject appeals to bigotry" and then back precisely the outcome those bigots back. You are in essence saying you agree with the bigots but just wish they would be a little nicer about it. You are in essence saying that the right to worship and assemble peaceably should be curbed when exercising those rights might run counter to "strong passions" and "keen sensitivities". You are in essence saying that grievance trumps first-amendment protections. This is a position unworthy of an organisation that claims to defend civil rights.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/07/religion