You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Thank you very much. You make that point very well. Let's hope people remember that. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Thank you very much. You make that point very well. Let's hope people remember that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Contrary to rumors, Kagan does not believe in federal marriage equality Ian David  May-10-10 07:35 PM   #0 
  - There is no federal right to any marriage  WeDidIt   May-10-10 07:37 PM   #1 
  - And for traditionalists ......  FBI_Un_Sub   May-10-10 08:02 PM   #6 
  - A states rights advocate. Now all becomes clear.  VMI Dem   May-10-10 08:53 PM   #8 
  - You mean that wasn't clear before?  jgraz   May-10-10 09:02 PM   #11 
  - A person familiar with how the constitution works  WeDidIt   May-10-10 10:28 PM   #15 
  - Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch  WeDidIt   May-10-10 10:27 PM   #14 
  - Exactly  customerserviceguy   May-10-10 09:57 PM   #13 
  - Precisely  WeDidIt   May-10-10 10:33 PM   #16 
  - Correct  mmonk   May-11-10 10:41 AM   #35 
  - Is 'duh' an acceptible response here?  HughMoran   May-11-10 04:53 PM   #42 
  - As has been noted elsewhere....  Jeff In Milwaukee   May-10-10 07:38 PM   #2 
  - Very good point! n/t  Ian David   May-10-10 07:38 PM   #3 
  - How would one explain DOMA?  bullwinkle428   May-10-10 08:51 PM   #7 
     - It's a bad law.  Dr Morbius   May-10-10 10:38 PM   #17 
        - It';s never been tested by the SCOTUS  WeDidIt   May-10-10 10:41 PM   #18 
  - Marvelous.  Bluebear   May-10-10 07:42 PM   #4 
  - ...!  bliss_eternal   May-10-10 07:44 PM   #5 
  - Obama believe marriage is between a man and a women, so he and she is a defender of DOMA. nt  boston bean   May-10-10 08:54 PM   #9 
  - He is a states rights advocate on the issue.  VMI Dem   May-10-10 08:58 PM   #10 
  - he believes in civil unions. he believes "marriage" is for a man and woman only. nt  boston bean   May-10-10 09:10 PM   #12 
     - The church wedding means nothing until you sign the legal paperwork.  alfredo   May-10-10 10:49 PM   #20 
        - +1  Jeff In Milwaukee   May-11-10 08:23 AM   #22 
        - Civil Unions Do Not Grant the Same Rights As Marriage In This Country.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 08:56 AM   #27 
           - That's the fault of how the law is written. If civil unions  alfredo   May-11-10 09:36 AM   #32 
              - Marriage Is the Legal Term In the United States to Define a Domestic Partnership  Toasterlad   May-11-10 10:39 AM   #34 
                 - Marriage is at its core, a civil union.  alfredo   May-11-10 11:24 AM   #36 
                    - Exactly. And When You Signed Those Papers, You Were Issued a MARRIAGE License  Toasterlad   May-11-10 01:07 PM   #37 
                       - Call it what you want, it is a legal contract.  alfredo   May-11-10 03:35 PM   #38 
                          - Of Course People Shouldn't Need the Blessing of Some Imaginary Being to Sign a Contract.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 04:48 PM   #41 
                             - Marriage has been made into some mythical union, when it isn't. The religious  alfredo   May-11-10 05:00 PM   #43 
                                - Again, No One's Arguing That Point. Of COURSE the Religious Aspects Shouldn't Be Used Against Gays.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 05:05 PM   #44 
                                   - Tell them to fuck off. You can't tell two adults they can't enter into a legal  alfredo   May-11-10 05:50 PM   #48 
  - White House Eliminated Pledge To Repeal Defense Of Marriage Act From Website  Ian David   May-11-10 08:45 AM   #25 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 08:57 AM   #28 
        - He's still better than McCain. n/t  Ian David   May-11-10 09:15 AM   #31 
  - FOR THE LOVE OF GOD - HAS ANYONE ON THIS SITE ACTUALLY READ THE CONSTITUTION?  PopSixSquish   May-10-10 10:46 PM   #19 
  - Loving v. Virginia  Jeff In Milwaukee   May-11-10 07:59 AM   #21 
  - To Fix Gay Dilemma, Government Should Quit the Marriage Business By Alan M. Dershowitz  Ian David   May-11-10 08:43 AM   #24 
  - How Come No One Wanted the Government Out of the Marriage Business Until Gays Wanted to Be Married?  Toasterlad   May-11-10 05:07 PM   #45 
     - That's a very good point.  Ian David   May-12-10 02:17 PM   #52 
  - Marriage Is a Legal Term To the United States Government and Nothing More.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 11:40 PM   #51 
  - Thank you very much. You make that point very well. Let's hope people remember that. n/t  Ian David   May-11-10 08:41 AM   #23 
  - YOU ARE WRONG, BUT THANKS FOR THE CAPS  Kurt_and_Hunter   May-11-10 08:48 AM   #26 
     - This Is the Best Post I've Read In Two Years.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 08:59 AM   #29 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 09:07 AM   #30 
     - CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME! N/T  Ian David   May-11-10 10:07 AM   #33 
  - Contrary to rumors, she has never given her viewpoint on same-sex marriage.  cbdo2007   May-11-10 03:42 PM   #39 
     - The Answer To a Senate Questionaire Is Not a Rumor.  Toasterlad   May-11-10 04:43 PM   #40 
        - No - the rumor is that she has given her viewpoint on same-sex marriage, which she hasn't.  cbdo2007   May-11-10 05:07 PM   #46 
           - So It's Your Contention That Sen John Cornyn, A Republican From Texas, Was Asking a Purely Academic  Toasterlad   May-11-10 05:21 PM   #47 
              - Yes. Any person of rational thought would have done the same thing, especially  cbdo2007   May-11-10 10:52 PM   #49 
                 - Someone Who Was Beholden To the Truth Wouldn't Have Made a Lie Of Omission  Toasterlad   May-11-10 11:34 PM   #50 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC