You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: It wouldn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. It wouldn't
If ratings went down basically the government would have to offer a higher rate of interest on bonds (which is what's happening to Greece right now, because they were overspedning and then fudging the national accounts until quite recently). A higher rate of interest means higher payments to bondholders (to compensate for the increased risk), and thus more of your taxes go towards debt service.

Now you might think that bondholders would want to crank the interest rates as high as possible in order to collect more interest, but doing so would mean that they were taking a greater risk with their investors' money and would in turn have to pay more interest themselves and hold more insurance against the risk of default. It would be easier and cheaper to just avoid the risk altogether and buy the bonds of some country with a healthy economy, such as Germany. Financial institutions are generally required to hold minimum amounts of highly-rated bonds in order to provide a sufficient degree of security for investors.

But if the rating were artificially lowered and not truly reflective of economic reality, the increased cost of bond service could be offset by allowing the currency to depreciate by the simple expedient of increasing the money supply, thus inflating away the debt. There's a distinct possibility that this might happen anyway to a limited degree, in order to smooth out the cost of debt management at relatively little real expense. that would )or perhaps will) lower the value of the dollar relative to other countries' currencies, which would reduce the real value of Wall Street profits.

Probably rather more than you wanted to know, and you shouldn't construe this as financial advice or an economics lesson. The short answer is that a credit downgrade would drive up taxes or necessitate a reduction in spending, but the benefits would go more towards other countries than towards Wall Street (please, no conspiracy theories about it being part of some secret attack on the dollar...politicians like to drag that one out when they're in trouble but reality is that there are tens of thousands of economists in the world, and it wouldn't be possible to fool all of them at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC