94. Juries are imperfect however that is why a complaint should have some merit.
You aren't suppose to be able to sue solely on speculative grounds.
A judge should dismiss a case in which the petitioner doesn't even make the argument as to how/why/where Mrs. Stacks was aware of the attack.
A judge should dismiss is EXACTLY for the reasons you indicate. She may NOT be negligent and could be found civilly liable for something that is not her responsibility.
The complaint indicate solely that (my paraphrasing) she should have know because she went to a hotel.
BS. B-FRACKING-S.
If that is all you got then the complaint is without merit. She is trying to go fishing (hoping to win without merit) and the judge has a responsibility to not let that happen.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
