The President has a right to criticize the court's ruling and do so in his SOTU (which I don't necessarily believe to be a wholly "political" event but rather a Constitutional requirement) and the justice has a right to disagree with that criticism.
I personally agree with the President's view, nevertheless I believe that the justice did nothing more than shake his head in disagreement and there was no outburst as we saw with the SC Congressman who was nothing more than rude and in breach of decorum.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
