39. That's not what your original statement said though
"Ms. Angelou can chastise and voice her opinion all she wants, but she doesn't get to define vulgarity for everyone any more than I do."
Again, her point is not she is defining what is vulgar - it's if someone is truly offended by what Imus said regarding ho.. any use of the word ho should be equally as objectionable. If the use of the word 'ho' offends someone it shouldn't matter where it comes from.
I also see your point however we're talking about two different things here.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
