Reply #35: Thanks, Joe. It's interesting that the story I ran last week on this...

[BradBlog]

received more than 200 recs. Today, fewer DU folks are willing to rec, it seems. Even though today's story features a LOT more, never before disclosed details.

Because a Dem is named here? Perhaps. But that's no excuse, frankly. Corruption is need corruption, and if even a tenth of these allegations are true, we're talking about massive NATIONAL SECURITY corruption.

I'd hope that readers will consider that, and put aside any partisan perspective they may be bringing to this case. The recs are greatly appreciated here. Particularly if ALL of the truth here is ever to be FORCED to come out.