13. Yes, the intentionally fuzzy language re who 'qualifies' for the PO is unfortunately quite telling
... and what it's saying doesn't look so hot. If it were otherwise, why such careful diligence in the verbiage/script writing, as to dance around a crucial point that they'd obviously rather not spend any more time with publicly than they're already being forced to?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
