Reply #132: well sure, it wouldn't preclude consistency with other scenarios

[subcomhd]

but you won't answer the question because we both know the fact pattern is indeed consistent with the allegation. It doesn't prove it. But it doesn't contradict it. There is nothing in it like a guest column in Cigar Aficionado about his tour of the local cigar factories - that I know of. He certainly spread rumors the Clinton's were murderers on much less evidence. Notice I said "less." I disagree that discussing these allegations and having an opinion about them drags anyone to his level.