You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #99: Boy, you're wrong on so much that it's impossible to know where to start. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #83
99. Boy, you're wrong on so much that it's impossible to know where to start.
Edited on Tue Jun-23-09 12:01 AM by stopbush
Let's start with using Wikipedia as your primary source on the matter.

Beyond that, a full metal jacketed bullet is a bullet that is designed to pass through a person and exit their body, just as it did with JFK. That's exactly the type of bullet a professional/contract assassin would NOT use. They would use a soft-nosed bullet that would break up in tissue and cause more damage as it made its way through the victim's body. CE399 IS the kind of bullet a military man like Oswald would be familiar with, and, the 6.5 mm bullet is the ONLY ammo that the MC rifle would accept.

The bullet CE399 was not pristine. Lead was extruding from its base as seen in this photo and the bullet was bent (testimony of Dr Michael Baden for the HSCA):



Ballistics tests performed on the rifle matched CE399 to Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world. The striations on the bullet matched it to the rifling thread in the barrel of Oswald's MC. I was not aware that clothing threads could cause striations on a full metal jacket bullet. Perhaps someone is misreading the word thread in this context.

Of course, anyone averring that CE399 was planted at Parkland must provide logical answers to these logical questions:

Why did the conspirators . . .

• Plant it in a location where it could easily have been lost?
• Plant a bullet that was only "slightly" damaged if its role was to have passed through at least the President? Why not shoot up some livestock and get a bullet a bit more mangled?
• Plant it before it could have been known how many other bullets would be recovered? How could they have known that CE 399 would not be the "one bullet too many" that would blow the whole plot?
• Plant the bullet so it was found before it was known how much lead was in JFK's neck/upper back? What if a big chunk of lead was found in JFK's neck or upper back, a chunk too big to have come from CE 399?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC