You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #115: It's a loan of money capital. You're playing word games. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. It's a loan of money capital. You're playing word games.
"It may appear somewhat startling that the Confederates should be able to borrow money in
Europe while the Federal Government has been unable to obtain a shilling from that usually
liberal and enterprising quarter. But the ... risk ... of never being paid at all, in case the
South should be subdued and re-annexed ... is so slight that, of itself, it need not deter any
man from sharing in an 8 per cent loan."

(The Economist, March 21, 1863, p. 309)


In March 1863, the Southern Confederacy floated a £3,000,000 loan issue in Europe. This loan is
often called the “Erlanger Loan” after its underwriter, Emile Erlanger and Company of Paris. The list of subscribers included British members of parliament and peers of the realm, two editors of The Times and other notables (New York Times, December 9, 1865).1 The offering was five times over-subscribed and John Slidell, Confederate Commissioner in France, enthused at this apparent “financial recognition of our independence, emanating from a class proverbially cautious and little given to be influenced by sentiment or sympathy.”2 The 8% yield referred to by The Economist (March 21, 1863) derived from coupon payments of 7% paid semiannually combined with an offering price set 10% below the bonds’ face value.3

In order for the holder to be sure of obtaining the cheap cotton, the Confederacy had to either win its struggle for independence or at least force the North to sue for peace. While there was some hope that the Union government might honour these bonds even if the Confederacy were defeated, the considerable risk that they would not made the bonds highly sensitive to news of the progress of the U.S. Civil War.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC