Reply #117: Name calling ? .... Point out ANY name calling in that post .....

[Trajan]

I have no need to continually respond to the same faulty assertions over and over again .... My essential arguments stand in the above threads, and you have not responded to those arguments in any substantial way that actually provided a refutation ....

Shifting the burden ? ... check ...

Ad Ignorantiam ? .... check ....

Circularity ? .... check ....

UNTIL you deal with these primary refutations, we have very little to discuss ....

Just because you choose to believe in something that has NO CONCRETE BASIS, that doesn't mean anyone else should feel compelled to believe it too .... Your assertion of the existence of the immaterial soul is unfounded and unwarranted, and is wholly fallacious ....

Until you effectively deal with the shifting burden and ad ignoratiam problems, you have nothing to stand on .... and we have nothing to talk about ...

But hey: You could accuse me of calling you names .....