You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: I don't think it's a racial issue. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. I don't think it's a racial issue.
I didn't think it was a racial issue 13 years ago. The 1995 trial was a fascinating trial with colorful characters, tons of evidence, witnesses galore, prosecutorial and police misconduct and ineptitude. The timeline took place over a period of several hours and was full of twists and turns. It read like a crime novel or a movie script. Blake, Spector and the other guy haven't gotten nearly the press as OJ. Not because of race, but because there just isn't as much to report on. Blake's life has been sad for 60 years. He killed his star-obsessed wife outside a restaurant. Not much there. Spector is an oddball who somehow managed to shoot a washed up actress in his home. The end. These two got about as much attention as Bob Crane's murder, Phil Hartmann's murder, and a hundred other cases. You're focusing on the wrong issue when you ask if someone is "as eager to see blah blah behind bars". That's race-baiting. The OJ murder case was different somehow. It had the right combination of things that kept people's attention. I learned a lot about law from the case. I also learned how divided along racial lines our country is. Some black people thought OJ should be found innocent because of something LA cops did and their history of abuse. One has nothing to do with the other. I kept hearing that white people were against OJ because he was married to a white woman. I don't think that was an issue at all. I don't know anyone who thought he was guilty and should be punished because he was married to a white woman. I never heard it, I never saw any wink-wink, it just wasn't an issue. My family, many of whom are VERY right-wing, were divided down the middle on guilt or innocence (this includes the ones who are now practically suicidal over Obama's win). It was not a divide along party lines. I had a very right-wing aunt (now deceased) who said OJ would never kill his wife with his own kids in the home. I asked what makes him different from thousands of others who HAVE killed a spouse with kids in the home. We had great debates about the evidence. It consumed our lives for a year. I think the press played up the bi-racial marriage a lot more than the public did. I thought he was guilty, but I understood the verdict because of the misconduct. He was found "not guilty" and not "innocent".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC