You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #59: That number is probably the fully-burdened BUDGET NUMBER [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

bean fidhleir

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-21-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3

59. That number is probably the fully-burdened BUDGET NUMBER

The burdened number accounts for salaries, bennies, a share of plant maintenance, and a share of everything else that goes into having N people employed.

When I was a boss, 25 years ago, I budgeted my engineering group based on a burdened number that hovered around $150K per year per person, and I guarantee you there wasn't a single soul including the highest-paid engineer in the group (he made a good bit more than I did) grossing that in salary and bennies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.