You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Yes, it seems... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, it seems...
...the meme for this GOP-created disaster is that only the rain caused the flooding!

No mention of the levees--almost three years after Katrina struck!

I guess someone doesn't want to ask tough questions about levees in Merka.

Hey, here's a recent picture of a levee in New Orleans:



Yes, that's water.

Almost three years after Katrina, the new levees are leaking.

And now, the ones in Iowa broke.

Out here in California, we've been trying to get someone to do something about the levees out by Sacramento.



That picture shows the one that broke in 2004, before Katrina.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have put a hault on construction in the Natomas area of Sacramento due to flooding fears. The current levee system that surrounds this area has been deemed inadequate, and construction will only be allowed if built 20 feet above ground.

Sacramento is one of the most flood-prone cities, sitting at the confluence of the Sacramento and Animas rivers and below Folsom Lake. The Natomas region, currently home to 70,000 people, is a natural catch basin that was deemed safe by the Corps in 1998. Since then development of the area has been rapid.

The building moratorium is likely to last a few years, until solutions to the levee problem can be solved. In the meantime, residents of the area are being told to store valuables in their second stories, and to purchase flood insurance.

The US Army Corps of Engineers has an extensive website with details about the Natomas area, including maps and other records.


Apparently, even after the levee break in Sacramento, and the disaster in the Mississippi gulf coast, the Army Whore Engineers can't make Sacramento a priority.

Aside from a GOP in the governor's mansion, what other reason could there be to delay finding a solution?

The Sacramento Valley is one of California's major agricultural regions, with more than 2.1 million acres of irrigated farmlands in the valley. Crops grown in the Sacramento Valley include rice, wheat, olives, orchard fruits, corn, alfalfa, tomatoes, and vegetables.

--U.S. Forest Service


That's a reason to make it a priority, but it still isn't, why?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC