You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Partly true I think [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Partly true I think
But the thing is even with the worst of the horror stories about foreclosures and bankruptcies etc most people who buy houses manage to afford to pay for them. How they do so in areas like yours and the SF Bay Area etc is to be honest beyond me, but they do. I'm in the mid 100's range in income myself, and don't live all that extravagantly for that income (Nissan Altima base model car, no hugely expensive vacations, buy clothes at JC Penneys. I do have a 10K motorcycle and about half that in a couple of collections, and I take a few short trips to the opera every year that are not cheap but that's about it. I certainly spend more than average in entertainment but even then it's sports bars not sushi houses so $30-40 a pop rather than hundreds), and yet I would be unable to swallow the house payments for anything over maybe $350K mortgage at a push. Right now I am moving so I will have one 200K mortgage and one 180K mortgage but that's for a couple months or so and I would be hesitant to do so for a long time. I could certainly qualify for more, but would not want to. This would proce me out of your market and those like it for anything worth buying.

How then do so many in the high buck areas manage to buy houses I could never dream of even with a comfortably top decile income? Dunno really but my guess is a lot of them simply leveraged the increase in their existing home. If I were to move into Arlington now I would be screwed. But had I lived there when I bought my first house 15 years ago, the increase in the value of that house would have meant I would have had a huge chuck of that $670K in equity, so would need only a comfortable mortgage to buy the house you describe.

Just to set up contrasts the $180K mortgage is for a 2700 sq ft 4 bed 3 bath 2.5 car garage 1/2 acre lot 1993 built nicely decorated home in a quiet suburb of Buffalo. The price was about 50K higher than that which I had in cash. Population decline is mostly an urban Buffalo phenomenon and there is plenty of money in the suburbs, so who knows what factors made it avoid the bubble you folks saw. It's certainly not that there aren't flippers and ARMs and greed here of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC