You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Presidential Signing Statements, and Alito's Role in Them, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Presidential Signing Statements, and Alito's Role in Them,
Are Questioned

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/14/politics/politicsspecial1/14statements.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Published: January 14, 2006

"Presidents since at least Andrew Jackson have issued statements as they signed legislation into law, but Samuel A. Alito Jr., President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, helped to introduce an innovation in that practice when he was a lawyer in the Reagan administration.

The new twist, as Edwin Meese III, then the attorney general, explained in a Feb. 25, 1986, speech, was to urge courts to look to the president's signing statement for evidence of "what that statute really means." Earlier presidential signing statements were, by contrast, bland proclamations, instructions to subordinates about how to execute a new law or a statement of disagreement with a part of a law...

Three weeks before Mr. Meese's speech, Mr. Alito, then a deputy assistant attorney general, submitted a memorandum to a Justice Department working group about what he called a novel proposal. Partly analytic and partly strategic, the memorandum considered how to accomplish Mr. Meese's goal of expanding presidential power in this area.

Mr. Alito wrote that "our primary objective is to ensure that presidential signing statements assume their rightful place in the interpretation of legislation." This would, he wrote, "increase the power of the executive to shape the law."

Mr. Alito predicted that "Congress is likely to resent the fact that the president will get in the last word on questions of interpretation."


http://www.archives.gov/news/samuel-alito/accession-060-89-269/Acc060-89-269-box6-SG-LSWG-AlitotoLSWG-Feb1986.pdf

"February 5, 1986

TO: The Litigation Strategy Working Group

FROM: Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Office of Legal Counsel

SUBJ: Using Presidential Signing Statement to Make
Fuller Use of the President's Constitutionally
Assigned Role in the Process of Enacting Law.

At our last meeting, I was asked to draft a preliminary
proposal for implementing the idea of making fuller use of Presidential
signing statements. This memorandum is a rough first
effort in that direction..."


Alito & the Point of No Return
By Nat Parry
January 9, 2006

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/010906a.html


Roll call on Alito confirmation

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00001




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC