You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: As I explained in an earlier post, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. As I explained in an earlier post,
when a candidate accepts donations from the big corporate lobbyists, that candidate virtually becomes an employee of the corporations. Thus, when that candidate becomes president, regardless of what that candidate may say or how vociferously that candidate will deny it, he or she owes his or her livelihood to the corporations and represents them. Thus, when the candidate, now president, sits at the negotiating table with the lobbyists for the corporations, there is only one party represented at that negotiating table -- the corporations. That is the way it is now in D.C. No matter where you go, most of the members of Congress and the administration owe their positions to corporate money. Thus the Congress members and the administration serve the same employer -- the huge multinational corporations -- Walmart, Halliburton, Eli Lilly, etc. They only serve us the people to the extent they absolutely have to to avoid our catching on.

Hillary is taking money from corporate lobbyists. If she is elected, she will be in their pay. The Des Moines Register also relies on the big multinational corporations for its income -- from their ad placements. The Des Moines Register, therefore, puts the interests of the multinationals first. Its editors state clearly that that is why they prefer Hillary. They are entitled to prefer her. So are you. But realize that your vote for Hillary is a vote for a person who will get along so well with big business because she is, in reality, its employee. Go ahead and vote for that.

But, remember, as long as we have a corporate employee in the White House and as long as corporate employees dominate in Congress, we will not have significant change -- not in the laws and regulations on the environment, on labor law, on healthcare, on world issues, not on anything. We will keep NAFTA pretty much as it is. We will not win the struggle to heal the environment. The polar bears will die just as other wildlife is now dying. And it will be because of your choice and the choices of all those who support candidates like Hillary who get along well with business, i.e., the big multinational corporations. It is your choice. I have chosen to support Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC