Reply #48: Has he actually been convicted of any of the above, or did you

[LisaL]

personally decide he was guilty?
All the articles say is that he had a license for the pot. The articles do not say he was a convicted felon, an illegal alien, or any of the things you listed.
In US, people are innocent until proven guilty. It seems to me that you decided the guy should not own the guy because you personally decided he was guilty of some of the things that would prevent someone from owning the gun. If you say the guy wasn't supposed to own a gun, then try to provide a link as to where he actually qualifies, and not because you personally think he is guilty of those things without him actually being convicted of any of it.