You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: This could all be an elaborate disinfo campaign intended to tarnish Syria and rehabilitate neocons [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. This could all be an elaborate disinfo campaign intended to tarnish Syria and rehabilitate neocons
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 11:47 PM by leveymg
One should be very skeptical of these claims that Saddam was really developing WMD and somehow shipped it all to Syria or Iran, or whatever country the goon squad wants to regime change next. I call BS on this.

Even NTI, which is at the extreme end of hawkish credibility, concludes: "These reports remain uncorroborated; in the absence of any definite information claims, reports that Syria has weaponized smallpox should be treated as purely hypothetical." See, http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Syria/Biological/3353.html

Sounds like Dekker's a second-string Judy Miller or Laurie Mylroie clone who's found a right-wing British tabloid willing to give her a platform. Re: Mylroie, see: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1254072,00.html

Did one woman's obsession take America to war?


She is a conspiracy theorist whose political conceits have consistently been proved wrong. So why were Bush and his aides so keen to swallow Laurie Mylroie's theories on Saddam and terrorism? By Peter Bergen

Monday July 5, 2004
The Guardian


Americans supported the war in Iraq not because Saddam Hussein was an evil dictator - they knew that - but because President Bush made the case that Saddam might hand weapons of mass destruction to his terrorist allies to wreak havoc on the United States. In the absence of any evidence for that theory, it's fair to ask: where did the administration's conviction come from? It was at the American Enterprise Institute - a conservative Washington DC thinktank - that the idea took shape that overthrowing Saddam should be a goal. Among those associated with AEI is Richard Perle, a key architect of the president's get-tough-on-Iraq policy, and Paul Wolfowitz, now the number-two official at the Pentagon. But none of the thinkers at AEI was in any real way an expert on Iraq. For that they relied on someone you probably have never heard of: a woman named Laurie Mylroie.
Mylroie has credentials as an expert on the Middle East, national security and, above all, Iraq, having held faculty positions at Harvard and the US Naval War College. During the 1980s she was an apologist for Saddam's regime, but became anti-Saddam around the time of his invasion of Kuwait in 1990. In the run-up to that Gulf war, with New York Times reporter Judith Miller, Mylroie wrote Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf, a well-reviewed bestseller.

SNIP


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC