You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Spot on! The attack is aimed at scaring Democrats into not voting for Edwards in the primary. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. Spot on! The attack is aimed at scaring Democrats into not voting for Edwards in the primary.
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 06:48 PM by AdHocSolver
I was asked this past weekend by some very liberal Democrats about which candidate I favored for president. When I said that I thought Edwards was the best choice and added that I believed Edwards had the best chance of winning, each of them jumped on me with the same harangue: "How can you say Edwards can win when he made that mistake of having his campaign paying $400 for a haircut?"

When I pointed out to these "Liberal Democrats" that, in the grand scheme of things, it was not such an important issue and that Edwards had dealt with it right away, they came back with the same almost verbatim retort that it would prevent him from beating a Republican. I am almost ashamed to admit that I lost my cool and blew up at them pointing out that the Republicans supported Bush who started an unnecessary war that cost thousands of lives, has nearly bankrupted the country with huge spending programs, war costs, and tax giveaways to the rich, has destroyed the morale of the military, and earned the U.S. the enmity of large parts of the world, and "you're worried about a stupid $400 haircut that Edwards paid for himself?..." At this point, each of them walked away from me, one of them practically running.

I immediately realized that the "$400 haircut" attack was aimed, not at Republicans or independents, but at liberal Democrats like these two guys, in order to scare them into voting for someone other than John Edwards in the primaries. It also occurred to me that if the Republicans are attacking Edwards even before the primaries, then he is the candidate that they most fear to face.

This experience has convinced me even more that John Edwards should be the Democratic candidate, as he has the best chance of getting the most Republican and independent crossover votes. Our candidate needs a large enough margin so that the Republican dirty tricks won't be enough to steal the election as happened in 2000 and 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC