Reply #18: Neither - it was on Channel 4

[muriel_volestrangler]

Which is run by a non-shareholder corporation - if it makes a profit (it's funded by advertising), it has to plough the money back into programme making, or film making (look at a lot of British films over the past 20 years or so, and you'll see 'Film Four' or similar in the list of financing companies).

Channel 4's charter tells it to be 'alternative', and it sometimes puts out deliberately controversial things like this.