Reply #6: Despite no evidence presented that the results were accurate?

[Imajika]

"The South Carolina Democratic Party Exec Board rejects Judge Vic Rawl's protest to the U.S. Senate primary results, despite NO evidence presented that the results were accurate"

Why on earth does the winning candidate have to prove the results were accurate?

The SC Dem Party simply has no grounds whatsoever to overturn the primary results.

Vic Rawl and the SC Democratic Party simply blew this. It is embarrassing as hell, but the winning candidate does not have to prove his winning results were accurate. What this means is Rawl presented absolutely no credible evidence that the result was due to tampering, defective or manipulated machines, etc.

The best hope is to find a way to persuade Greene to pull out of the race. There simply is nothing else that can be done. Either way, we aren't going to defeat DeMint in November anyway.

edited for spelling