You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: I think it needs to be no bill at all. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I think it needs to be no bill at all.
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 03:01 AM by eomer
Because I'm strongly opposed to a mandate without a public option. But without a mandate it is impossible to eliminate the pre-existing condition exclusion. It is a domino effect so that once you knock the public option out then you've got to take the mandate out and once the mandate is out then you've got to put the pre-existing condition exclusion back and then we're left we something that is not worth doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC