You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peleiu, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, Invading Japan would have been no picnic. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 02:03 PM
Original message
Peleiu, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, Invading Japan would have been no picnic.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 02:05 PM by SidneyCarton
Starting with Peleiu the Japanese Army switched tactics to oppose the U.S. "Island Hopping" strategy. Instead of massive resistance on the beach in a series of "banzai" charges, they turned to a strategy of attrition, where they held out in the volcanic caves and highlands of these islands, and fought long, grinding delaying campaigns.

Who is to say that such would not have been the case on Kyushu and Honshu, targets of Operations Olympic and Coronet?

Furthermore, those who advocate blockade... Assuming a blockade of Japan was both feasible and workable, what is your position on the decade of sanctions we held on Iraq? If our starvation of a generation of Iraqi children was immoral, would it not have been equally so to do so to the Japanese?

Finally, let us consider the Soviet angle for a moment... By the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet Army was already in motion, engaging the Japanese in Manchuria, as well as sweeping down Sakhalin and the Kuriles, toward a possible occupation of Hokkaido and northern Honshu. Considering the fate of other regions occupied by the Soviets in east Asia, there is the possibility that, much like on the Korean peninsula, we would still be maintaining an armed border between a U.S. backed South Japan and a pseudo-Stalinist North?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were awful events, horrors without true parallel in human history (if for no other reason than that so little ordinance was necessary to cause so much death) They also stand as awful harbingers of the ultimate cost of total war, which is the total annihilation of the human race. Yet the alternatives in August 1945 were by no means marvelous. Did Truman make the wrong decision, maybe. But as the grandson of two men who enlisted in the Navy in 1945, any alternative would have had more than academic consequences for me and my family, as it would have had for the families of countless thousands, if not millions of Americans and Japanese (as well as likely Russians) that were otherwise spared.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Peleliu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Iwo_Jima
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Okinawa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall

Edited to add reading material
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC