You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: The removal of Carney wouldn't be that difficult, it is a norm that [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. The removal of Carney wouldn't be that difficult, it is a norm that
when the new president takes office they hire new DOJ US Attorneys. Most of the bush US Attorneys have offered their resignations or are ready to do so when asked by Obama. Carney is not one of those that is willing to resign, she has asked to be allowed to remain.

The Office of Professional Responsibility is the division of the DOJ that investigates the alleged wrongs of the DOJ.

The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility is investigating the Siegelman case, so Holder may be inclined to wait for the results of that effort before making any move. A spokesman for DOJ pointed out to the Times that an appeals court panel recently upheld Siegelman's conviction, and because he is appealing that decision, "the department will continue to litigate this matter in the courts, not in the media."

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/seventy-five_ex-ags_to_holder_review_siegelman_cas.php#more


On April 8 Holder named Mary Patrice Brown to head the OPR. I'm sure she is trying to keep up with all the complaints. As the article referenced above states, it is unlikely that Brown or Holder will interfere with the Siegelman case as long it is "in the courts". I do think the efforts to increase the sentence beyond what the judge originally ordered (and beyond what the DOJ recommended in the presentence report) are of concern and that those who do care (beyond bitching on a message board) should send letters to Brown and Holder reflecting their outrage at this unfair twist. The 11th circuit considered Siegelman's sentence and found it appropriate, they just ordered the court reconsider it taking into account the reversals. That doesn't afford them the chance to increase his sentence beyond what was ordered pre-appeal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC