You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Radiation is SO scary. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Radiation is SO scary.
I've been exposed to high level ionizing radiation. I had my gonads about a foot away from a 1 rem per hour hot spot once.

Guess what, I'm perfectly fine. And so are the residents of Vermont. ENVY was actually one of the plants I applied for an operations position at. They're one of the older operating plants. BWR style reactors like this generally treat the entire plant as a containment structure, which means that any fluid which drips on the floor drains to special storage tanks to prevent discharge to the environment. Also since it is from the feedwater system, it is likely downstream of the condensate polishers, which means that all the short lived radioactives have decayed out, and most of the long term have been scrubbed out by the polishers.

So the public is entirely safe, and the only people at risk of contamination are the employees, and the contamination levels are likely so low that they won't even register anything above background.

And I also like how you decided to quote me out of context. What I said was that a three year old could run a MODERN plant during a LOCC casualty without causing fuel damage. Since the majority of the statement consists of technical terms, it's fairly important to keep the phrase intact. So since this plant was a second generation BWR and not a 4th gen, it really doesn't count. That said it was 'technically' a LOCC, however the leak rate was so slow it likely didn't impact core water levels, or require a scram. In fact it barely qualifies as a leak, since it's 60 drops a minute. Considering that the pressure in that pipe could be as high as 1000 psi, that's not very obscene, they likely get worse leakage if you combined the leakage rate from every single valve packing gland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC