You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #49: The poster's comment in #24 above...
[View All]
enuegii
(624 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-15-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
| 49. The poster's comment in #24 above... |
|
really struck a chord with me: "I think the rigid, national planning is a problem."
Isn't that what laissez-faire capitalists have preached all these years as the main reason Communism is not a viable economic system?
I mean, does it really make a difference if it's the government or huge multi-national corporations that dictate what is sold and when?
Or, is supply-side economics just Marxism with a heapin' helpin' o' Jeebus?
Sorry... eight years of the Bushbaby may have driven me mad.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread