Reply #162: ...alternatively:

[baby_mouse]

"My experience of X is universal whilst the experience of all others in the same matter is unique and can be viewed only through the lens of their status as an emotional wreck with little innate self-confidence and whilst being incapable of forming a bond of mutual trust."

Which, and I say this as an ex-polyamorist (a fellow ex-polyamorist?), *I* would never say, not being privy to the emotional wreckedness or otherwise of of which set I have admittedly viewed only a small and apparently (to me) well-balanced cross-section (a few of the British ones). I will capitulate instantly on this matter upon the production of statistics of any kind.

there'll always be a rush to listen to the tiny pocket of folks who say that it's the line's fault.

I had addressed this, in fact. I'm uncertain what you intended?