You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #105: What an odd set of circumstances. Warning: potential spoilers [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
105. What an odd set of circumstances. Warning: potential spoilers
Edited on Sun Jul-20-08 06:51 AM by The Backlash Cometh
First of all, the internet blogs hatched because the media lost their ability to criticize. The art of criticism, was therefore safely being practiced on the tubes, while the papers were busy being toads for their newspaper bosses. We have had to make do on our own, so we are now of independent thought. I'm guessing that's why this movie critic sees the public discourse on the net as "mob mentality." Since we've learned to live without the middle man, our combined voices must appear like a unified movement, even though it couldn't be further from the truth. Most of us feel very isolated, which is the reason we jump on the net to begin with.

BTW, I saw Dark Knight and found the concepts refreshing. It is so true that A) people want a white knight, but B) that white knight has to remain pure in order for people to continue believing in him, therefore, C) all the other guy has to do is destroy the white knight's public image, by getting the white knight to cross the line so there is no difference between him and the people he's trying to put behind bars. i.e. Elliot Spitzer.

So, the movie basically exposes the human conundrum. Nobody can meet our expectations 100%, so someone has to play the dark knight, doing things which break the rules (homeland security intrusions), but they also have to be willing to take the ire from the public for those breaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC