Reply #108: There was no one home for Christ's sake.

[DefenseLawyer]

How can personal safety be implicated without a person? Your boy left the safety of his home and shot two unarmed men in the back in someone else's yard. You can say you support vigilantism, more power to you. You can say kill 'em all and let god sort them out. You aren't the first. But don't give me that "immediate threat to personal safety" bullshit. Under these facts, that dog don't hunt.